Paraneoplastic movement disorders.

Paraneoplastic movement disorders are diverse autoimmune neurological illnesses occurring in the context of systemic cancer, either in isolation or as part of a multifocal neurological disease. Movement phenomena may be ataxic, hypokinetic (parkinsonian), or hyperkinetic (myoclonus, chorea, or other dyskinetic disorders). Some disorders mimic neurodegenerative or hereditary illnesses. The subacute onset and coexisting nonclassic features of paraneoplastic disorders aid distinction. Paraneoplastic autoantibodies provide further information regarding differentiating cancer association, disease course, and treatment responses. A woman with cerebellar ataxia could have metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 autoimmunity, in the setting of Hodgkin lymphoma, a mild neurological phenotype and response to immunotherapy. A different woman, also with cerebellar ataxia, could have Purkinje cytoplasmic antibody type 1 (anti-Yo), accompanying ovarian adenocarcinoma, a rapidly progressive phenotype and persistent disabling deficits despite immune therapy. The list of antibody biomarkers is growing year-on-year, each with its own ideal specimen type for detection (serum or CSF), accompanying neurological manifestations, cancer association, treatment response, and prognosis. Therefore, a profile-based approach to screening both serum and CSF is recommended. Immune therapy trials are generally undertaken, and include one or more of corticosteroids, IVIg, plasma exchange, rituximab, or cyclophosphamide. Symptomatic therapies can also be employed for hyperkinetic disorders.

Genetic testing for non-parkinsonian movement disorders: Navigating the diagnostic maze.

Genetic testing has become a valuable diagnostic tool for movement disorders due to substantial advancements in understanding their genetic basis. However, the heterogeneity of movement disorders poses a significant challenge, with many genes implicated in different subtypes. This paper aims to provide a neurologist's perspective on approaching patients with hereditary hyperkinetic disorders with a focus on select forms of dystonia, paroxysmal dyskinesia, chorea, and ataxia. Age at onset, initial symptoms, and their severity, as well as the presence of any concurrent neurological and non-neurological features, contribute to the individual clinical profiles of hereditary non-parkinsonian movement disorders, aiding in the selection of appropriate genetic testing strategies. There are also more specific diagnostic clues that may facilitate the decision-making process and may be highly specific for certain conditions, such as diurnal fluctuations and l-dopa response in dopa-responsive dystonia, and triggering factors, duration and frequency of attacks in paroxysmal dyskinesia. While the genetic and mutational spectrum across non-parkinsonian movement disorders is broad, certain groups of diseases tend to be associated with specific types of pathogenic variants, such as repeat expansions in many of the ataxias. Some of these pathogenic variants cannot be detected by standard methods, such as panel or exome sequencing, but require the investigation of intronic regions for repeat expansions, such as Friedreich's or FGF14-linked ataxia. With our advancing knowledge of the genetic underpinnings of movement disorders, the incorporation of precise and personalized diagnostic strategies can enhance patient care, prognosis, and the application and development of targeted therapeutic interventions.

Current opinions and practices in post-stroke movement disorders: Survey of movement disorders society members.

BACKGROUND: Post-stroke movement disorders (PSMD) encompass a wide array of presentations, which vary in mode of onset, phenomenology, response to treatment, and natural history. There are no evidence-based guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of PSMD. OBJECTIVES: To survey current opinions and practices on the diagnosis and treatment of PSMD. METHODS: A survey was developed by the PSMD Study Group, commissioned by the International Parkinson's and Movement Disorders Society (MDS). The survey, distributed to all members, yielded a total of 529 responses, 395 (74.7%) of which came from clinicians with experience with PSMD. RESULTS: Parkinsonism (68%), hemiballismus/hemichorea (61%), tremor (58%), and dystonia (54%) were by far the most commonly endorsed presentation of PSMD, although this varied by region. Basal ganglia stroke (76% of responders), symptoms contralateral to stroke (75%), and a temporal relationship (59%) were considered important factors for the diagnosis of PSMD. Oral medication use depended on the phenomenology of the PSMD. Almost 50% of respondents considered deep brain stimulation and ablative surgeries as options for treatment. The lack of guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment was considered the most important gap to address. CONCLUSIONS: Regionally varying opinions and practices on PSMD highlight gaps in (and mistranslation of) epidemiologic and therapeutic knowledge. Multicenter registries and prospective community-based studies are needed for the creation of evidence-based guidelines to inform the diagnosis and treatment of patients with PSMD.

[Drug-induced movement disorders : nosology and treatment]. / Mouvements anormaux iatrogènes : aspects nosologiques et thérapeutiques.

Movements disorders are frequently encountered in general practice and emergency departments and are in many cases of iatrogenic origin. Dopamine D2 receptor blocking agents (DRBA), mainly neuroleptics, are most often incriminated. These drug-induced movement disorders (DIMD) can be classified according to the kinetics of the manifestations (acute DIMD and tardive syndromes), the phenomenology of the abnormal movements observed or depending on the pharmacological agent involved. The diagnosis is based on the time course of the events, clinical examination and meticulous anamnesis of the patient's previous and current treatments. Management is always based on the interruption of the suspected causal treatment when possible. Some cases have a severe prognosis and require immediate treatment.

Les mouvements anormaux sont fréquemment rencontrés en médecine générale et aux urgences et sont, dans de nombreux cas, d'origine iatrogène. Les molécules les plus souvent incriminées sont les agents bloqueurs des récepteurs dopaminergiques D2 (DRBA) et principalement les neuroleptiques. Ces mouvements anormaux iatrogènes (MAI) peuvent être classés selon la cinétique des manifestations (MAI aigus et syndromes tardifs), la sémiologie des mouvements observés, ou encore, selon l'agent pharmacologique en cause. Le diagnostic repose sur le décours temporel des manifestations, l'examen clinique et une anamnèse fouillée des traitements antérieurs et actuels du patient. La prise en charge repose toujours sur l'arrêt du traitement causal quand cela est possible. Il existe des situations urgentes grevées d'un pronostic sévère et redevables d'un traitement rapide.

Next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics in rare movement disorders.

The ability to sequence entire exomes and genomes has revolutionized molecular testing in rare movement disorders, and genomic sequencing is becoming an integral part of routine diagnostic workflows for these heterogeneous conditions. However, interpretation of the extensive genomic variant information that is being generated presents substantial challenges. In this Perspective, we outline multidimensional strategies for genetic diagnosis in patients with rare movement disorders. We examine bioinformatics tools and computational metrics that have been developed to facilitate accurate prioritization of disease-causing variants. Additionally, we highlight community-driven data-sharing and case-matchmaking platforms, which are designed to foster the discovery of new genotype-phenotype relationships. Finally, we consider how multiomic data integration might optimize diagnostic success by combining genomic, epigenetic, transcriptomic and/or proteomic profiling to enable a more holistic evaluation of variant effects. Together, the approaches that we discuss offer pathways to the improved understanding of the genetic basis of rare movement disorders.

Genetic Testing of Movements Disorders: A Review of Clinical Utility.

Currently, pathogenic variants in more than 500 different genes are known to cause various movement disorders. The increasing accessibility and reducing cost of genetic testing has resulted in increasing clinical use of genetic testing for the diagnosis of movement disorders. However, the optimal use case(s) for genetic testing at a patient level remain ill-defined. Here, we review the utility of genetic testing in patients with movement disorders and also highlight current challenges and limitations that need to be considered when making decisions about genetic testing in clinical practice. Highlights: The utility of genetic testing extends across multiple clinical and non-clinical domains. Here we review different aspects of the utility of genetic testing for movement disorders and the numerous associated challenges and limitations. These factors should be weighed on a case-by-case basis when requesting genetic tests in clinical practice.

A Critical Appraisal of the Whack-a-Mole and Swivel Chair Signs in the Diagnosis of Functional Movement Disorders.

BACKGROUND: The demonstration of positive signs during neurological examination is a cornerstone of the diagnosis of functional movement disorders, however, the available data supporting the diagnostic value of some of these signs is limited. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic value (sensitivity and specificity) of the "whack-a-mole" (WAM) and "swivel chair" (SC) tests in patients with functional movement disorders (FMD). METHODS: We enrolled patients with functional and organic movements in the WAM test if they exhibited tremor, dystonia, myoclonus, chorea, or tics. For the SC test, patients with a gait disorder as their primary impairment were recruited. Two blinded movement disorder specialists rated the presence of these signs in edited videos. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 42 patients with FMD and 65 patients with organic movement disorders. Both tests demonstrated high specificity (means, 78% and 96%), but their sensitivity was low (means, 52% and 37%). Interobserver agreement for the WAM sign was 0.77 in the FMD group, against 0.28 in patients with organic movement disorders, whereas Movement Disorders Clinical Practice for Review Only for the SC sign was 0.69 in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that physicians must be cautious in the application and interpretation of these clinical signs in the diagnosis of functional movement disorders, and they should be carefully considered and used as necessary.

How to face the hemifacial spasm: challenges and misconceptions.

Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is characterised by intermittent, brief or sustained, repetitive contractions of the muscles innervated by one facial nerve. It is one of the most frequent movement disorders affecting the face. However common and allegedly straightforward to diagnose, it might reveal as a challenge for clinicians in various situations. Indeed, it often needs prior exclusion of many other movement disorders affecting the face, with frequent phenomenological overlaps with blepharospasm, post-facial palsy, facial motor tics, etc. The clinical diagnosis shall be supported by modern brain imaging techniques, and sometimes electromyography, as some particular aetiologies may require specific treatment. Primary forms are associated with vascular compression of the ipsilateral seventh cranial nerve, whereas secondary forms can be caused by any injury occurring on the facial nerve course. This article proposes a global and organised approach to the diagnosis, and the ensuing therapeutic options, as many practitioners still use some inefficient medications when they encounter a case of facial spasm.

Prediction of movement difficulties at 5 years from parent report at 2 years in children born extremely preterm.

AIM: To assess the predictive validity of parent-reported gross motor impairment (GMI) at age 2 years to detect significant movement difficulties at age 5 years in children born extremely preterm. METHOD: Data were from 556 children (270 males, 286 females) born at less than 28 weeks' gestation in 2011 to 2012 in 10 European countries. Parent report of moderate/severe GMI was defined as walking unsteadily or unable to walk unassisted at 2 years corrected age. Examiners assessed significant movement difficulties (score ≤ 5th centile on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition) and diagnoses of cerebral palsy (CP) were collected by parent report at 5 years chronological age. RESULTS: At 2 years, 66 (11.9%) children had moderate/severe GMI. At 5 years, 212 (38.1%) had significant movement difficulties. Parent reports of GMI at age 2 years accurately classified CP at age 5 years in 91.0% to 93.2% of children. Classification of moderate/severe GMI at age 2 years had high specificity (96.2%; 95% confidence interval 93.6-98.0) and positive predictive value (80.3%; 68.7-89.1) for significant movement difficulties at age 5 years. However, 74.5% of children with significant movement difficulties at 5 years were not identified with moderate/severe GMI at age 2 years, resulting in low sensitivity (25.1%; 19.4-31.5). INTERPRETATION: This questionnaire may be used to identify children born extremely preterm who at age 2 years have a diagnosis of CP or movement difficulties that are likely to have a significant impact on their functional outcomes at age 5 years.

New-onset movement disorder in the immediate postpartum period.

This case report describes a woman who developed involuntary, uncoordinated movements of her face and limbs following a spontaneous vaginal delivery, complicated by postpartum haemorrhage. Using systematic assessment with multidisciplinary team input, a differential diagnosis was proposed and relevant investigations were undertaken. Atypical eclamptic or generalised seizures were excluded clinically and neuroimaging ruled out an intracranial vascular event such as stroke or venous sinus thrombosis. Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity was managed empirically with intravenous lipid emulsion and intravenous fluids. A diagnosis of drug-induced dyskinesia was made, most likely secondary to ondansetron, with which dystonias and myoclonus have been described. This woman's symptoms were transient and resolved within 2 hours.This case presented a complex differential diagnosis, highlighting the paucity of guidance available. We propose a diagnostic algorithm to aid in the identification of acute involuntary movements in pregnancy and the puerperium.

Clinical Reasoning: A 3-Year-Old Boy With Abnormal Movements During Sleep.

We report a case of a 3-year-old boy who presented with abnormal movements that initially occurred only during sleep. Three years later, he went on to develop hyperkinetic movements during the daytime while awake. There was a strong family history of various paroxysmal neurologic disorders. In this report, we discuss the clinical approach, differential diagnosis, investigation, and treatment options for nocturnal hyperkinetic movements and paroxysmal movement disorders.

The role of laboratory investigations in the classification of tremors.

INTRODUCTION: Tremor is the most common movement disorder. Although clinical examination plays a significant role in evaluating patients with tremor, laboratory tests are useful to classify tremors according to the recent two-axis approach proposed by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society. METHODS: In the present review, we will discuss the usefulness and applicability of the various diagnostic methods in classifying and diagnosing tremors. We will evaluate a number of techniques, including laboratory and genetic tests, neurophysiology, and neuroimaging. The role of newly introduced innovative tremor assessment methods will also be discussed. RESULTS: Neurophysiology plays a crucial role in tremor definition and classification, and it can be useful for the identification of specific tremor syndromes. Laboratory and genetic tests and neuroimaging may be of paramount importance in identifying specific etiologies. Highly promising innovative technologies are being developed for both clinical and research purposes. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, laboratory investigations may support clinicians in the diagnostic process of tremor. Also, combining data from different techniques can help improve understanding of the pathophysiological bases underlying tremors and guide therapeutic management.

Limitations of Multigene Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for "Cerebral Palsy" Phenotype and Other Complex Movement Disorders.

In the past couple of decades, literature in pediatric neurology and clinical genetics has identified hundreds of monogenic disorders that can masquerade as infantile cerebral palsy (CP). Accurate and prompt diagnosis in such cases may be challenging due to several reasons. There are commercial multigene CP panels, but their diagnostic yield is often limited compared with exome sequencing because of diverse etiologies that may mimic CP. We report one such case where a patient with spastic hemiplegia underwent a long diagnostic journey before genetic diagnosis was established with exome sequencing and appropriate management was started. TTC19-related mitochondrial complex III deficiency is an ultrarare disorder of energy metabolism that presents with bilateral lesions in the basal ganglia and a degenerative neuropsychiatric phenotype.

Paroxysmal movement disorders: Paroxysmal dyskinesia and episodic ataxia.

Paroxysmal movement disorders have traditionally been classified into paroxysmal dyskinesia (PxD), which consists in attacks of involuntary movements (mainly dystonia and/or chorea) without loss of consciousness, and episodic ataxia (EA), which features spells of cerebellar dysfunction with or without interictal neurological manifestations. In this chapter, PxD will be discussed first according to the trigger-based classification, thus reviewing clinical, genetic, and molecular features of paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia, paroxysmal nonkinesigenic dyskinesia, and paroxysmal exercise-induced dyskinesia. EA will be presented thereafter according to their designated gene or genetic locus. Clinicogenetic similarities among paroxysmal movement disorders have progressively emerged, which are herein highlighted along with growing evidence that their pathomechanisms overlap those of epilepsy and migraine. Advances in our comprehension of the biological pathways underlying paroxysmal movement disorders, which involve ion channels as well as proteins associated with the vesical synaptic cycle or implicated in neuronal energy metabolism, may represent the cornerstone for defining a shared pathophysiologic framework and developing target-specific therapies.